Every national leader, scored across nine dimensions of power — from economy and diplomacy to crisis management and defense. Compare current form against the legacy they'll leave behind, and see who's really delivering.
Alice Mina & Vladimiro Selva — Captains Regent, San Marino | NationsHelm
Diff-Adjusted (Medium)59ⓘDifficulty-Adjusted Score— this leader's Overall scaled by their nation's Governing Difficulty tier (Medium). It rewards strong results in structurally constrained states and applies a modest discount in high-capacity ones.
Role
Captains Regent
Party
Sammarinese Christian Democratic Party / Party of Socialists and Democrats
Alice Mina & Vladimiro Selva, Captains Regent of San Marino, is rated 59 (mid tier) on NationsHelm's Leadership scale. Their standout dimension is Politics (79/100). In global media, their Communication signal reads 48/100 (high confidence), tracked from GDELT. The pressure to watch: Economic Pressure — Economy score of 52 indicates ongoing challenges with macroeconomic management in San Marino.
The data & sources
The 59 rating is a derived blend of Alice Mina & Vladimiro Selva's leadership dimensions, each computed from sourced public inputs — none estimated. Communication 48/100 derives from GDELT DOC tone, reach and message resilience (high confidence). Diplomatic Signal — no country-level data; shown as "No data" rather than inferred.
The risk read
Alice Mina & Vladimiro Selva's governing-stability conditions have no sourced score yet, so treat leadership-driven country risk as unquantified here. Crisis exposure 0/100 (Minimal exposure); response untested. For the full opportunity, market-pulse and resilience read, see San Marino's nation page.
The strategic read
A strategic read of Alice Mina & Vladimiro Selva's governing profile. Live pressures: economic pressure. The sharpest institutional vulnerability is Defense (0/100). Profiles as an Institutionalist — Governance through rules, process, and precedent.
Alice Mina & Vladimiro Selva — shareable intelligence cards
5
Downloadable NationsHelm cards for each signal in this dossier.
▾
Generating…
Trading card — front & back
Generating…
Strengths & weaknesses
Generating…
Strengths & Weaknesses
Top Strengths
Politics79
Political coalition-building and governability
Governance73
State management and policy execution capacity
Institutional Integrity72
Perceived transparency and anti-corruption track record
Key Weaknesses
Communication Signal
48/ 100high confidence
Coverage tone42%79
Favourability of media coverage over the tenure (GDELT tenure-mean tone), cross-leader percentile
Media reach33%9
Media volume (GDELT tenure-median daily coverage) percentile, gated down when coverage is hostile
Message resilience25%—
Does tone / approval hold up when attention spikes vs. calmer periods (derived)
Compare this leader
Stack this leader against any other in the NationsHelm database.
Alice Mina & Vladimiro Selva is the Captains Regent of San Marino, from the Sammarinese Christian Democratic Party / Party of Socialists and Democrats.
How is Alice Mina & Vladimiro Selva rated on NationsHelm?
Alice Mina & Vladimiro Selva holds a Leadership Rating of 59 out of 100 (moderate). It is a derived blend of sourced leadership dimensions — governance, communication, diplomacy and others — never an estimate.
What are Alice Mina & Vladimiro Selva's strengths and weaknesses?
Alice Mina & Vladimiro Selva's strongest leadership dimension is Politics (79/100); the weakest is Defense (0/100), ranked from the leadership radar.
What challenges does Alice Mina & Vladimiro Selva face?
The main pressures are economic pressure. Economy score of 52 indicates ongoing challenges with macroeconomic management in San Marino.
What kind of leader is Alice Mina & Vladimiro Selva?
Alice Mina & Vladimiro Selva profiles as an Institutionalist — Governance through rules, process, and precedent.
How is Alice Mina & Vladimiro Selva viewed internationally?
Alice Mina & Vladimiro Selva has a Communication signal of 48/100 from GDELT media coverage.
Data coverage:112 live·72 derived·1 authored·15 beta|Last refreshed: Jul 15, 2026|Methodology:Reconstructable|Cite:How to cite
Spot an error?
SourceWorld Bank + derived
MethodWeighted average
ConfMedium
✓ Reconstructable
ⓘLeadership Rating is a weighted average of 9 dimensions. Five use live World Bank indicators; the rest are derived from sourced signals (WIPO/Oxford/UNESCO, GDELT, World Bank + UCDP, survey data) where coverage exists. Diplomacy has no source yet, and anything unsourced shows as no data. Political position is V-Dem V-Party expert coding. Full weights on the Methodology page.
Leadership archetype
Generating…
Communication signal
Generating…
Current challenges
Defense0
National security doctrine and defense capability
Communication48
Public communication, oratory, and media presence
Economy52
Economic stewardship, growth, and macro stability
Vision60
Strategic foresight and long-term reform capacity
Source: Derived·Method: Ranked by stat value·✓ ReconstructableⓘUp to five strengths (dimensions scoring 70+) and five weaknesses (scoring below 70), ranked from the leadership radar. Descriptions are fixed per dimension and don't vary by country. Dimensions without a sourced signal show as no data. Full model on the Methodology page.
Leadership Radar
Current Capability
Governance
73
Economy
52
Diplomacy
—
Politics
79
Crisis Response
—
Vision
60
Communication
48
Institutional Integrity
72
Defense
0
Source: World Bank + derived·Method: Mixed·✓ ReconstructableⓘGovernance, Economy and Politics use live World Bank / WGI indicators. Institutional Integrity (V-Dem), Vision (WIPO/Oxford/UNESCO), Defense (real force counts), Crisis Response (World Bank + UCDP + WGI), Communication (GDELT) and Diplomacy (the Diplomatic Signal) are sourced or derived signals. Any dimension without a sourced signal shows as no data. Full model on the Methodology page.
Country scores are blended with live World Bank data where available. Difficulty reflects the structural challenge of governing this nation — not the leader's individual performance.
Source: World Bank·Method: Unweighted average·✓ ReconstructableⓘCountry scores are the unweighted average of scored World Bank indicators — the same model used on the nation's own page. Difficulty reflects structural constraints on governing this nation, independent of the current leader, and is used to compute the Difficulty-Adjusted Score.
Leadership Archetypes
Institutionalist
Governance through rules, process, and precedent. High governance and institutional integrity scores define this profile — a leader who strengthens institutions rather than uses them, often at the cost of short-term agility.
Also reads as
Consensus Builder
Coalition-oriented leadership built around negotiated outcomes. Strong in politics and communication, this archetype navigates complex multi-party environments by trading optimal policy for inclusive coalition management.
SourceDerivedMethodRule-based classificationConfDeterministic✓ ReconstructableⓘArchetypes are derived automatically from the leadership stat profile — not hand-assigned. No archetype is assigned when the profile lacks a qualifying signal: the leader reads as "No data", never a fallback label. A secondary archetype is added only when a stat scores exceptionally high.
Crisis
Exposure
0/ 100
Minimal exposure
Response
Untested
Untested
Low confidence · no major shock in mandate
Worst year (2026) — shock drivers
Conflict intensity0
Each is a global percentile: how this year's shock compares to every country-year on record. Disaster shocks are not yet sourced (no open-licensed annual series).
Sourced from 1 mandate-year (2026–2026), 1 of 4 shock components present.
SourceWorld Bank GDP + UCDP deaths (annual + Candidate GED) + WGI stabilityMethodCountry-year shock severity · peer-relative damageConfLow✓ ReconstructableⓘCrisis Exposure measures how severely a leader was tested — a peak-biased aggregate of per-year shock severity (conflict intensity, economic contraction and political-stability decline vs. recent normal) over the mandate. It is context, not a verdict: high exposure is neither good nor bad on its own. Crisis Response measures how the country fared during its genuine crisis years relative to comparable crisis episodes worldwide — country-years hit with the same shock severity. Higher = less national damage than peers at that severity. Leaders who never faced a major shock are marked Untested rather than rewarded. Per country-year, real WB/UCDP/WGI shocks are winsorised and percentile-ranked into a ShockSeverity; Exposure is the peak-biased mandate aggregate. Crisis years (severity ≥ 60) score Response = 100 − damage percentile among comparable-severity crises worldwide, then severity-weighted over the mandate. Untested = no major shock (never rewarded). Absent components are reweighted, never filled.
Diplomatic Signal
Awaiting data
No sourced diplomatic signal yet. This proxy blends GDELT engagement volume, cooperative share, media tone and geographic spread — it populates once at least half its inputs are sourced.
Reach is discounted to 54% of its raw percentile because tenure-mean coverage tone skews unfavourable — hostile attention isn't credited as positive reach.
SourceGDELT DOC 2.0MethodWeighted blend (42/33/25)ConfHigh✓ ReconstructableⓘA pure media-communication signal, blended from GDELT and renormalised over what's present: Coverage Tone (42%); Media Reach (33%, gated down when coverage is hostile); and Message Resilience (25%). Domestic approval is not counted here. Shown only where GDELT coverage exists. Full model on the Methodology page.
Current Challenges
Economic Pressuremedium
Economy score of 52 indicates ongoing challenges with macroeconomic management in San Marino.
Source: Derived·Method: Rule-based·✓ ReconstructableⓘFlags challenges when key dimensions fall below thresholds (Economy < 55, Institutional Integrity < 50, Stability < 50) or difficulty is Very Hard / Legendary. Economy derives from World Bank indicators; Institutional Integrity from V-Dem's executive-corruption index (World Bank Control of Corruption as fallback).
Leadership Conditions
Government stability
—/ 100
Awaiting data
External conditions
—/ 100
Awaiting data
No sourced governing conditions yet. Government Stability blends WGI, V-Dem, UCDP and Fragile States signals; External Conditions derives from a World Bank GDP-growth shock — the card fills in once those cover this tenure.