How does your leader really rank?
Every national leader, scored across nine dimensions of power — from economy and diplomacy to crisis management and defense. Compare current form against the legacy they'll leave behind, and see who's really delivering.
V-Dem V-Party — economic left–right (v2pariglef, expert-coded), medium confidence, party position coded 2006.
The story
Mahmoud Abbas, President of Palestine, is rated 30 (lower tier) on NationsHelm's Leadership scale. Their standout dimension is Diplomacy (78/100). In global media, their Communication signal reads 27/100 (high confidence), tracked from GDELT. The pressure to watch: Economic Pressure — Economy score of 1 indicates ongoing challenges with macroeconomic management in Palestine.
Downloadable NationsHelm cards for each signal in this dossier.
Favourability of media coverage over the tenure (GDELT tenure-mean tone), cross-leader percentile
Media volume (GDELT tenure-median daily coverage) percentile, gated down when coverage is hostile
Does tone / approval hold up when attention spikes vs. calmer periods (derived)
Stack this leader against any other in the NationsHelm database.
Mahmoud Abbas is the President of Palestine, from the Fatah.
Mahmoud Abbas holds a Leadership Rating of 30 out of 100 (very weak). It is a derived blend of sourced leadership dimensions — governance, communication, diplomacy and others — never an estimate.
Mahmoud Abbas's strongest leadership dimension is Diplomacy (78/100); the weakest is Defense (0/100), ranked from the leadership radar.
The main pressures are economic pressure and legitimacy pressure. Economy score of 1 indicates ongoing challenges with macroeconomic management in Palestine.
Mahmoud Abbas profiles as a Diplomat — Foreign policy and international positioning define this leadership style.
Mahmoud Abbas has a Communication signal of 27/100 from GDELT media coverage and a Diplomatic Signal of 81/100 from GDELT events.
Country scores are blended with live World Bank data where available. Difficulty reflects the structural challenge of governing this nation — not the leader's individual performance.
Foreign policy and international positioning define this leadership style. High diplomacy scores — often paired with strong governance fundamentals — suggest a leader who builds national power through multilateral engagement.
High exposure
Fared worse than comparable crises
Worst year (2024) — shock drivers
Each is a global percentile: how this year's shock compares to every country-year on record. Disaster shocks are not yet sourced (no open-licensed annual series).
Sourced from 19 mandate-years (2008–2026), 3 of 4 shock components present; damage ranked against 381 comparable crises.
International relations and multilateral negotiation
National security doctrine and defense capability
Economic stewardship, growth, and macro stability
Political coalition-building and governability
Public communication, oratory, and media presence
Strategic foresight and long-term reform capacity
International diplomatic events the country takes part in (GDELT Events) — country-level
Share of international interactions coded cooperative vs conflictual — country-level
Favourability of foreign coverage of the leader on diplomacy — leader-level
Distinct foreign source countries covering the leader on diplomacy — leader-level
Partial coverage: 70% of the formula's weight is currently sourced; the score renormalises over what's present. Remaining components appear as data lands.
Reach is discounted to 14% of its raw percentile because tenure-mean coverage tone skews unfavourable — hostile attention isn't credited as positive reach.
Economy score of 1 indicates ongoing challenges with macroeconomic management in Palestine.
Continuity & legitimacy of 21 points to a contested or fragile mandate underpinning Palestine's institutions.
Institutional Integrity score of 48 reflects persistent accountability pressures that constrain institutional effectiveness.
Stability score of 41 indicates the system's performance is heavily dependent on this leader — a concentration risk.
Low political violence · High factional pressure · Contested legitimacy
Adverse global conditions.
WGI Political Stability & Absence of Violence
WGI Rule of Law, Government Effectiveness & Control of Corruption
V-Dem political continuity and regime legitimacy
UCDP organized-violence deaths, population-scaled and inverted — prefers the fresh current-year UCDP-CED reading, else the finalized annual GED
Fragile States Index social-cohesion pillar
3-year direction of the WGI stability score
