Every national leader, scored across up to eight dimensions of tenure contribution — from governance and economy to politics and crisis response. Compare current form against the legacy they'll leave behind.
Donald Trump is a former President of the United States, from the Republican Party.
How is Donald Trump rated on NationsHelm?
Donald Trump holds a weak Legacy Rating of 50 out of 100. It is a derived blend of sourced leadership dimensions — governance, communication, diplomacy and others — never an estimate.
Data coverage:107 Sourced·85 Derived|Scores refreshed: 2026-08-24·snap-20260824-c9f25cd0|Methodology:Reconstructable|Cite:How to cite
Spot an error?
Profile
Legacy Rating50.0as of 2026-08coverage 6/8
Role
President
Party
Republican Party
Term
2017–2021
Country
United States
Political Position
LeftFar RightRight
V-Dem V-Party — economic left–right (v2pariglef, expert-coded), medium confidence, party position coded 2018.
SourceTenure record + derivedMethod
A note when the record changes — and when a prediction resolves. Free.
Donald Trump served as President of the United States. Donald Trump holds a weak Legacy Rating of 50 out of 100.
The data & sources
The Legacy Rating of 50 is a derived blend of Donald Trump's leadership dimensions, each computed from sourced public inputs — none estimated. Diplomatic Conduct — no country-level data; shown as "No data" rather than inferred. Governing-stability conditions score 64/100, renormalised over WGI, V-Dem and UCDP.
The risk read
For country-risk purposes, Donald Trump's tenure reads as moderately stable: governing-stability conditions score 64/100. Crisis exposure 56/100 (Moderate exposure); response 47/100 (Fared worse than comparable crises). For the full opportunity, market-pulse and resilience read, see the United States' nation page.
The strategic read
Governing conditions: stability 64/100. The sharpest institutional vulnerability is Vision (40/100).
Analyst OutlookAI · not a sourced score
claude-fable-5 · 2026-08-25
Cited, adversarially-verified forward analysis — every claim is sourced and survived a red-team. An LLM intelligence brief, not a sourced score, and never blended into this leader's ratings.
Trump promised a four-week war; in month six it has 18 American dead, $37.5 billion spent, 31% support and a 10-year yield at 4.7% — and the number that will end it is not November's, it is the next Treasury auction's.
The Consensus
A wartime president at 33% heading into a midterm wipeout: the Iran war he promised would take weeks is in its sixth month, gas is at a record $4.10, payrolls are contracting, the House is priced 83% Democratic and the Supreme Court has struck his tariffs, his birthright order and his Fed firing — the read is a lame duck by November whose remaining instruments are executive orders the courts keep voiding.
No rally, no recovery: Trump's net job approval in the Silver Bulletin average is worse than -10 on election day, 2026-11-03 — a ceasefire, a Xi state visit and an 'economic D-Day' do not move him back inside the range where a president holds the House.
AI · not a sourced score · claude-fable-5 · 4 cited sources · red-teamed · never blended into ratings
Wrong if the Silver Bulletin net approval average on 2026-11-03 is -10.0 or better. by 2026-11-03
Confidence76%
Show the caseHide the case
Strongest counter — A signed Iran settlement or a visible Hormuz reopening would give him the rally he has not had, the Xi state visit is scheduled for September, and his first-term net at this point was -11.6 — a ten-point swing in ten weeks is not unprecedented. Survives because the war's opponents now include a third of Republicans, gas prices set records on the calendar, payrolls turned negative in July, and the last nine months of data run one way: every 2026 reading found sits between 32% and 40%, and the net has not been better than -12 since spring.
Superseded 5 · open calls from 2026-07-08 · on Premium
Crisis
Exposure
56/ 100
Moderate exposure
Response
47/ 100
Fared worse than comparable crises
Medium confidence · 1 crisis year in mandate
Worst year (2020) — shock drivers
Economic contraction75
Political-stability decline82
Each is a global percentile: how this year's shock compares to every country-year on record. Disaster shocks are not yet sourced (no open-licensed annual series).
Sourced from 5 mandate-years (2017–2021), 2 of 4 shock components present; damage ranked against 358 comparable crises.
Leadership Radar
Tenure Contribution
Balanced profile — 19-point spread from Economy to Vision.
Country scores are blended with live World Bank data where available. Difficulty reflects the structural challenge of governing this nation — not the leader's individual performance.
Source: World Bank·Method: Unweighted average·✓ Reconstructable
Leadership Archetype
No distinct archetype
The sourced dimensions are tightly grouped (19-point spread), but no dominant specialization meets an archetype rule. This is a reading of the sourced stats — not a data gap.
SourceDerivedMethodRule-based classificationConfDeterministic✓ ReconstructableⓘArchetypes are derived automatically from the leadership stat profile — not hand-assigned. "No distinct archetype" means no classification rule matched; profile shape is assessed separately from the best-to-worst spread. A leader lacking enough sourced stats reads as "No data". A secondary archetype is added only when a stat scores exceptionally high.
Political Legacy
Legacy Rating
50
Assessment
ContestedDerivedDerived from the published Legacy Rating band — ≥84 Transformational · 72–83 Lasting · 60–71 Mixed · 42–59 Contested · <42 Negative.
Years Served
4
Peak Strengths
No dimension scored 70 or above.
Relative Weaknesses
Vision40
Politics41
Crisis Response47
Post-Office Metrics
Macro Tailwind/Headwind Adjustment
Compare this leader
Stack this leader against any other in the NationsHelm database.
One email a week — the predictions that resolved and the scores that moved on the nations and leaders you follow.
Weighted average
ConfMedium
✓ Reconstructable
ⓘLegacy Rating is the completed-tenure rating derived from sourced leadership dimensions and the recorded conditions of that tenure — on the published scale a score near 60 means the country broadly matched the benchmark trajectory over the mandate. Anything unsourced shows as no data. Full weights on the Methodology page.
Source
World Bank GDP + UCDP deaths (annual + Candidate GED) + WGI stability
ⓘCrisis Exposure measures how severely a leader was tested — a peak-biased aggregate of per-year shock severity (conflict intensity, economic contraction and political-stability decline vs. recent normal) over the mandate. It is context, not a verdict: high exposure is neither good nor bad on its own. Crisis Response measures how the country fared during its genuine crisis years relative to comparable crisis episodes worldwide — country-years hit with the same shock severity. Higher = less national damage than peers at that severity. Leaders who never faced a major shock are marked Untested rather than rewarded. Per country-year, real WB/UCDP/WGI shocks are winsorised and percentile-ranked into a ShockSeverity; Exposure is the peak-biased mandate aggregate. Crisis years (severity ≥ 60) score Response = 100 − damage percentile among comparable-severity crises worldwide, then severity-weighted over the mandate. Untested = no major shock (never rewarded). Absent components are reweighted, never filled.
41
Crisis Response
47
Vision
40
Communication
—
Institutional Integrity
50
Source: World Bank + derived·Method: Contribution·✓ ReconstructableⓘEach dimension measures change under the leader relative to global trends — how the indicator moved over their tenure, net of the world's move over the same window — not the country's absolute level. A score near 60 means performance broadly matched the benchmark trajectory; above = improved the country's standing, below = declined. Governance / Economy / Politics / Institutional Integrity from World Bank WGI, WDI and V-Dem trajectories; Vision from the country's innovation rank (WIPO patents + UNESCO tertiary), former leaders only (patents lag ~3 years); Crisis Response (World Bank + UCDP + WGI, an absolute response-quality scale) and Communication (GDELT) from tenure signals; Diplomacy (Diplomatic Conduct) is active-only. A tenure under six months, or an indicator whose series hasn't reached the term, shows as no data. Full model on the Methodology page.
Stewardship
Inherited-strength lens · separate from the rating
45inherited strengths eroded
Governance
53
Politics
40
Integrity
—
Innovation
40
3 of 4 groups eligible and sourced
Source: World Bank WGI + V-Dem + derived·Method: Stewardship·✓ ReconstructableⓘMeasures whether strong institutions inherited at the start of the tenure were preserved, improved or eroded. It does not reward the leader for inheriting a strong country. A metric qualifies only when the inherited baseline was at least 75 on its normalized scale; the score is the world-net change over the tenure on the single public scale (60 = preserved relative to global movement). Requires two or more eligible sourced groups, the six-month tenure floor and a post-tenure-start observation — otherwise No data, never a zero. Weights mirror the current-form groups (gov 0.17 · pol 0.15 · int 0.08 · vis 0.09), renormalized over what is eligible and sourced.
Strengths & Weaknesses
Top Strengths
Key Weaknesses
Vision40
Strategic foresight and long-term reform capacity
Politics41
Political coalition-building and governability
Crisis Response47
How the country fared in its genuine crisis years vs. comparable crisis episodes (higher = less damage than same-severity peers); Untested when no major shock. Test severity is tracked separately as Crisis Exposure
Institutional Integrity50
ⓘ
Country scores are the unweighted average of scored World Bank indicators — the same model used on the nation's own page. Difficulty reflects structural constraints on governing this nation, independent of the current leader.
—
External conditions during tenure
Perceived transparency and anti-corruption track record
Governance53
State management and policy execution capacity
Donald Trump Legacy Rating: 50/100 — President, United States (2017–2021) | NationsHelm
Source: Derived·Method: Ranked by stat value·✓ ReconstructableⓘUp to 5 strengths (dimensions scoring 70+) and 5 weaknesses (scoring 57 or below), ranked from the leadership radar. Dimensions in the 58–69 benchmark band appear in neither column. Descriptions are fixed per dimension and don't vary by country. Dimensions without a sourced signal show as no data. Full model on the Methodology page.
